Added by Admin
Matt Cutts explains what it means if your site has a manual action labeled as “Unnatural links to your site—impacts links” and what you can do to fix it. Unn…
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
I am a bit confused about this. On the support page it says “If you don’t
control the links pointing to your site, no action is required on your
part.” but 3rd party sites suggest this manual action is a penalty, and
this video recommends doing something about the links like contacting the
webmasters and using the disavow tool. I find this to be a bit of a mixed
message. Do I do something about this or not? Am I being penalized?
This is a really great video actually… It’s good to know that Google will
reach out to people who have a difficulty with their site or with any
aspect of SEO, there are many good, genuine SEO people out there, this
really helps them to do things in the best interests of the Client and also
Um, I’m pretty sure there are other search engines out there besides
Google. How about we exercise our consumer rights and send our business to
them and tell Google to pound sand? I haven’t ever used Google and get
along just fine…
Despenalizar un sitio en Google webmaster tools por una penalización manual
por enlaces no naturales no siempre es sencillo. Google no proporciona
todos los enlaces que apuntan al sitio y hay que juntar información de
otras fuentes como majesticseo o ahrefs.com. Luego hay que agrupar los
enlaces, eliminar duplicados, aislar los que son dofollow y revisar los que
podrían ser clasificados como enlaces perjudiciales por Google.
Una vez listados todos los enlaces de pago o de baja calidad hay que tratar
de ponerse en contacto con los webmasters propietarios de esas webs para
que eliminen esos enlaces o les pongan un atributo nofollow y esto es una
tarea árdua pues la mayoría de los webmasters no suelen contestar o hacer
caso a estas peticiones.
Luego de todo este trabajo hay que enviar al disavow tool de google los
enlaces de baja calidad que no hayamos sido capaces de eliminar y solicitar
la reconsideración de la penalización. Este proceso puede tardar entre uno
y dos meses mientras google nos contesta si hemos pasado la penalización.
Unnatural #Links Explained | #Spam Warnings http://ow.ly/tQGwb
Google took manual specific manual action against my site – then upgraded
it to sitewide without a further notice or reason. The inbound links listed
on WMT do not contain links to my site anywhere, that I can find, we’ve
spent months trying to trawl through the links / issues and there are now
no links left that we built or have any control over, and they still punish
the site. Great for those who want to practice negative SEO – but
completely unfair that google can destroy a business for a reason that’s
out of that businesses control.
I wondering if there is already filled up class action against google ?
Dumbest thing I ever heard! If you allow people spam websites for many
years and then ban them then you act like monopolistic company! This is in
your best interest catch the links and remove them instead of playing games
of showing me 3 examples! This is against the logic, you just want fools to
clean internet for free! for the links they already paid big bucks!
Unnatural Links to site – impacts links
*News from **#Google** about changes to Reputation Management*
Matt Cutts warned against linking strategies that promoted sites that did
not have authoritative content or contained questionable “truths.” In the
video, Cutts uses the example of a very positive article being promoted
through linking strategies at a time when negative press was targeting the
same subject of the article.
If you are concerned about #ORM for your product, company or individual
profile, the warning may further stress those concerns, but it doesn’t
meant that ORM can’t accomplish its goals.
Maybe for the first time Google speak about reputation management… in
their blog: “Example scenario: reputation management”
Unnatural links to your site—impacts links
Unnatural links warning video.
Google (Matt Cutts) mentions online reputation management for the first
time, I think.
The kind of solution might be if you just ignore algorithmically all of
those unnatural links to any website. I really want to know you thoughts
about negative SEO and how to defense that danger?
Matt, as per your words: “Google’s primary purpose,…is to make sure that
you just get the BEST search results and that we PROTECT users from having
a BAD search experience. So…, we’re thinking about how do we return the
BEST quality results, how do we make sure that we NOT return SPAM…” You
guys at Google have got it ALL WRONG!! Just GET RID of your ‘Backlinks’
criteria to rank sites on Page 1 and simply concentrate on QUALITY content,
ONLY then you will achieve your stated goals – PERIOD!
Hello, thank you for this video. How do we know which links are the bad
ones and which are the good ones? I would really like to remove the bad
ones. Thanks again.
How would Google rank your site without backlinks? Quality content is a
subjective opinion that Google bot simply cannot do.. The only way for
Google to give you credit for your “quality content” is through backlinks.
Do your really think a machine can read an article and say “hmm, this
article is really good, you should rank.” A machine cannot think like a
person nor can it have an opinion. This is just simply not possible. The
only way your quality content will rank, is when sites link to it.
Thanks to Ahrefs tool, I’m tracking backlinks and put the new suspicious
one into disavow tool, I don’t have that time to contact each websites
webmaster and ask them to remove the link, it’s time consuming work and in
most cases they won’t remove the links, because they get money for them. I
think the negative SEO will rise it’s power in the future if you don’t do
anything about it. It’s really cheap to buy thousands of links in SAPE or
any other link network.
quality content only gets natural backlinks don’t think you can outsmart
google they have team they spend millions trust me they know better than you
I tend to think if you hit by penalty or through Algorithm or manual,
forget the site and move on and learn from it.
Excellent presentation with wonderful instructions, thanks Matt!!! There’s
no doubt, Google is meant to provide a better SEO service to their millions
of searchers out there. Therefore Google wants us to clean up any links
that could potentially harm our sites being penalized.
The background design is like the iPhone 5c covers. Way to stay ahead.
Thanks so much Matt. I’ve always wondered what would happen if someone
started blasting my blog as part of a reputation management strategy to
boost it for some unrelated keyword. It is good that your team is
differentiating between this and regular blackhat stuff.
so basicly someone can destroy our website by spamming 24/7 bad links to
NEW! The Social Media Marketing Strategy Key Note and Executive Summary -- So...
How to Build a Comprehensive Social Media Marketing Strategy for Major
MBA LEVEL: How to Explain Social Media Marketing to "OLD School" Executives
For OLD School CEOs: Marketing Strategy from the Real Rollodex to The
Added by Admin
5 years ago
1.84K Views0 Comments0 Likes
1.61K Views1 Comments0 Likes
1.78K Views0 Comments0 Likes
1.47K Views1 Comments0 Likes
1.46K Views1 Comments0 Likes
1.70K Views2 Comments0 Likes